Metal Finishing Guide Book


Issue link:

Contents of this Issue


Page 496 of 843

which absorbs radiation from a light source. A light source from a hollow cathode lamp or an electrodeless discharge lamp is used, which emits a spectrum specific to the element being determined. The high cost of these lamps is a disadvantage of the AA method. A detector measures the light intensity to give a quantitative determination. DAAA is similar to flame photometry in that a sample is aspirated into a flame and atomized. The difference between the two methods is that flame photometry measures the amount of emitted light, whereas DAAA measures the amount of light absorbed by the atomized element in the flame. In DAAA, the number of atoms in the ground state is much greater than the number of atoms in any of the excited states of the spectroscopic methods. Consequently, DAAA is more efficient and has better detection limits than the spectroscopic methods. Spectral interferences occur when a wavelength of an element being analyzed is close to that of an interfering element. The analysis will result in an erroneously high measurement. To compensate for this interference, an alternate wavelength or smaller slit width is used. When the physical properties (e.g., viscosity) of a sample differ from those of the standard, matrix interferences occur. Absorption can be enhanced or suppressed. To overcome these interferences, matrix components in the sample and standard are matched or a release agent, such as EDTA or lanthanum, is added. Chemical interferences are the most common interferences encountered in AA analysis. They result from the nonabsorption of molecularly bound atoms in the flame. These interferences are minimized by using a nitrous oxide-acetylene flame instead of an air-acetylene flame to obtain the higher flame temperature needed to dissociate the molecule or by adding a specific substance (e.g., lanthanum) to render the interferant harmless. Chemical interferences can also be overcome by extracting the element being determined or by extracting the interferant from the sample. The sensitivity and detection limits in AA methods vary with the instrument used, the nature of the matrix, the type of element being analyzed, and the particular AA technique chosen. It is best to use concentrations of standards and samples within the optimum concentration range of the AA instrument. When DAAA provides inadequate sensitivity, other specialized AA methods, such as graphite furnace AA, cold vapor AA, or hydride AA, are used. In graphite furnace AA (GFAA), the flame that is used in DAAA is replaced with an electrically heated graphite furnace. A solution of the analyte is placed in a graphite tube in the furnace, evaporated to dryness, charred, and atomized. The metal atoms being analyzed are propelled into the path of the radiation beam by increasing the temperature of the furnace and causing the sample to be volatilized. Only very small amounts of sample are required for the analysis. GFAA is a very sensitive technique and permits very low detection limits. The increased sensitivity is due to the much greater occupancy time of the ground state atoms in the optical path as compared with DAAA. Increased sensitivity can also be obtained by using larger sample volumes or by using an argon-hydrogen purge gas mixture instead of nitrogen. Because of its extreme sensitivity, determining the optimum heating times, temperature, and matrix modifiers is necessary to overcome possible interferences. Interferences may occur in GFAA analysis due to molecular absorption and chemical effects. Background corrections compensate for the molecular absorption interference. Specially coated graphite tubes minimize its interaction with some elements. Gradual heating helps to decrease background interference, and permits determination of samples with complex mixtures of matrix components. The GFAA method has been applied to the analysis of aluminum, antimony, 487

Articles in this issue

view archives of Metal Finishing Guide Book - 2013