Metal Finishing Guide Book

2012-2013

Issue link: https://metalfinishing.epubxp.com/i/98750

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 186 of 903

coating materials and application methods LOW-VOC WATERBORNE COATINGS BY RON JOSEPH (1944 - 2011) RON JOSEPH & ASSOCIATES INC., SAN JOSE, CALIF. This article focuses on a comprehensive range of waterborne coating technologies, which include water-reducible, dispersion, and latex formulations. Advantages and disadvantages of each of the resin systems are listed to serve as a guide to assist in the selection of a VOC-compliant coating. Metal fabricators and coating users located in areas that are considered to be in nonattainment with the ozone standard have already addressed the problems of selecting VOC compliant coatings. However, the New Clean Air Act amendments of 1990 have more clearly defined when an area is in attainment with the standard. In fact, the implementation of VOC regulations for surface coatings will depend on whether an area has been designated extreme (only Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside), severe, serious, moderate, or marginal. Consequently, thousands of fabricators and other coating users who have not previously been affected by the VOC regulations, will soon be searching for low-VOC coatings. The predominant question people will need to resolve is whether to convert to lowVOC, solvent-based coatings or waterborne coating systems. Numerous papers have been published extolling both types of systems. Indeed, since the mid 1980s, high-quality compliant coatings have been available to meet even the stringent requirements of California and other state rules. This paper is devoted solely to compliant waterborne coatings, which are applied by dip, flow, or one of the many types of spray equipment commonly used in coating facilities. The paper does not claim that waterborne coatings are better than their solvent-based cousins, or vice versa. On the contrary, both types of systems should be carefully considered before making the final selection. Before discussing the various waterborne resin systems, it must be pointed out that most VOC regulations limit the VOC content of a coating in terms of pounds per gallon or grams per liter, less water, and less exempt solvent. Exempt solvent-containing coatings are not discussed in this paper; therefore, only the less-water terminology will be explained. One gallon of a waterborne coating (water reducible, water dispersible, or latex) contains many ingredients, specifically, the resin or binder pigments, extender pigments, coalescing agents, a small quantity of co-solvents, and usually a fairly substantial amount of water. The volatile portion of the coating comprises the co-solvents and water. In a one-gallon can, the co-solvents, which are considered to be the VOCs, may account for less than 1.0 lb. In other words, the VOC content of the coating may only be 1.0 lb/gal. The VOC regulations, however, require that the VOC content of the coating be calculated as if no water were in the coating. Depending on the coating formulation, the VOC content, less water, may be considerably higher, such as 2.0 lb/gal or more. In this section all references to VOC content automatically assume the less-water values; therefore, when it is stated that a coating technology is commercially available with a VOC content of, say, 2.3 lb/gal, it can be assumed that implies less water. For those who are not familiar with the EPA's differentiation between air- or force-dried coatings and those that cure by baking, a few words of clarification 181

Articles in this issue

view archives of Metal Finishing Guide Book - 2012-2013